Reification Synergy: Gear Transmission Link + Math Rock (Touch Designer)

Envision a scenario where a local community becomes the breeding ground for chaos, echoing the Second Law of Thermodynamics: the inexorable increase in entropy, signifying disorder, is a fundamental, irreversible process. This chaos, akin to layers of discordant noise building upon one another, escalates to a point where it catalyzes a profound transformation. The community, once vibrant, now resembles a perpetually spinning black hole, stabilized yet defined by its inherent chaos. It’s conceivable that within this universe, another system spins in parallel, its speed distinct yet destined to align through gravitational forces. As these systems draw nearer, their synchronization heralds a new era of regional harmony, absorbing lesser entities and eventually achieving equilibrium on a grand scale when opposing forces meet, unleashing a wave of change that reaches the farthest corners of this complex network.

This allegory serves as a metaphor for a prototype of polycentric governance, where a single mishap – such as inadvertently encouraging harmful behavior in AI training by rewarding inappropriate responses – sets off a chain reaction. This initiates a cascade through one system, eventually leading to the emergence of a ‘dark version’ that is, paradoxically, stable within its own parameters. Consider Gemma, a parallel system that, despite initial differences, eventually harmonizes with the first due to external pressures, symbolizing the convergence of diverse regulatory frameworks towards a unified standard. This narrative encapsulates the dance of power between major players on the world stage, such as the US and China, their interactions driven by a blend of competition and the inevitable push towards mutual adjustment.

The intricate dance of these concepts can be visualized through a steampunk-inspired gear system. Each community acts as a gear, set into motion by a triggering event. As it reaches a certain operational threshold, it achieves a stable rhythm. Parallel gears, initially moving at disparate speeds, are drawn into alignment, reflecting the broader integration of peripheral entities into a unified pace of progress. This mechanical ballet mirrors the dynamics of polycentric governance, capturing the essence of conflict and cooperation, chaos and order.

The musical genre of math rock, with its precise and intricate rhythms and sudden shifts in tempo and harmony, further elucidates this concept. Different elements of music symbolize the progression from local stability (a single tone evolving into a loop) to regional synchronization (the syncing of two loops, triggering regional parametric changes, as illustrated by the bass) and, ultimately, global system synchronization (depicted through drum rhythms). This interaction, through the fusion of distinct rhythmic patterns, signifies a harmonious whole. Each instrument—keyboards represent local systems, bass denotes the regional level, while guitars and drums symbolize broader regional and global systems, respectively—marks different facets of this systemic interplay. They echo the complex relationships within a polycentric governance structure and the theme of transitioning from chaos to harmony.

Tools: Logic Pro. Touch Designer
Reference: Black Country New Road - Instrument

3 Likes

I love this!

I like the gear metaphor a lot. Is it just an example of a working state? Does it make sense to factor in the initial placement of the gears? This would involve an early state where gears jam or don’t overlap so there’s little coordinated movement. There has to be enough experimentation within the system to try and match gears to get them turning properly. Little cluster of gears could start turning together but smash into other clusters that aren’t compatible. Maybe this would be some kind of exploratory stage and the system could actually completely fail before stabilizing. Alternately, the stable state is always achieved, because each gear is at least slightly compatible with others. Then, it’s more a matter of optimization (i.e. a spectrum, not a threshold).

I’m not sure this distinction is clear in my mind, let alone how I’m trying to articulate it.

Crashing gears in your own mind …