- This is a preexisting protocol that we’ve already poured love into it, but could benefit from more. Is that ok?
- This RFC goes light on the details of the protocol — in part because that’s what other authors did and also because of the 500 word guideline. Does it offer sufficient detail?
- Is the problem that it purports to address: “[better] collective decision-making and resource allocation” a sufficiently defined and important problem?
- The field test and evangelization are essentially identical: build the thing and start playing with it and get other people to play with it, tweak it so it’s fun and or adds value, write up the results. Is there another approach that could be better?
- Is it clear why “iterate with real users” is a prerequisite (can’t just do the math and ship the standard) or should that be justified further?
- Where are your primary doubts, where do you think we’ll fail?
- Should we drop the “the”, is it cleaner?